The Content Lawyer

The Content Lawyer

An Intellectual Property and Technology Law Firm Focusing on the Legal and Business Needs of Successful Creatives, Content Users, Sports Teams and Entertainment Venues.

+1-202-596-5682
Email: elliott@thecontentlawyer.com

Alderman IP
1455 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20004 USA

Open in Google Maps
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Copyright Law
    • Trademark Law
    • Sports Venue Consulting
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Contact Us

A Summary of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1999)

1
Elliott Alderman
Sunday, 05 September 1999 / Published in Copyright Law, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, DMCA, Intellectual Property Law

A Summary of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1999)

On October 28, 1998 President Clinton signed into law the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Pub.L. 105-304 [“DMCA”]. The DMCA makes clear what was understood by many: that the U.S. Copyright Act protects the words that you are reading on this Internet page in the same manner as if they were in a book or a newspaper.

In the information age, content is king and the Internet has the potential to be a publisher  nonpareil. As computers, television and the Internet become integrated, the packets of information that comprise motion pictures, sound recordings and textual materials race around the world. Whether this digital medium will fulfill someone’s marketing dream and replace consumer desire to see and touch the flashy packaging of existing videocassettes, compact discs and books remains to be seen. It may be that as the Internet market develops the digital realm becomes a supplement to the advertising and distribution of hard copy goods, instead of a replacement distribution network. But regardless of how the market shakes out, the reality is that the Internet is merely a pipeline and does not work without the protected content of copyright owners. And these owners are understandably reluctant to place their works in an environment with unrestricted access and swift, pervasive, uncompensated distribution.

The DMCA was born out of this conflict between the Wild West spirit of the Internet and the regulated world of restricting the uses of copyright-protected content. In the mid-nineties, the Patent and Trademark Office [“PTO”] reviewed whether the then-existing version of the copyright law needed amendment in the nascent digital world. In Green and White Papers, published respectively in 1994 and 1995, the PTO recommended limited changes. However, digital copyright protection has been translated into encryption, other technological protection measures and electronic contracts, all of which restrict access to works. Users fear that fair use and other limitations on owners’ exclusive rights will be restricted by unthinking technology. To address the viability of digital fair use, the PTO also held a Conference on Fair Use, publishing a largely inconclusive report last year.

On a parallel international front, the World Intellectual Property Organization [“WIPO”] considered the trans-global nature of the Internet world. In 1996 WIPO produced two treaties, which attempted to harmonize existing national laws and provide for global standards for digital protection. The DMCA incorporates the major provisions of the WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties.

In addition, the new law:

  • provides for certain limitations on Internet service provider liability;
  • changes existing caselaw to permit the repair of computers by providers other than the owner or lessee of the machine without liability for making an unauthorized reproduction into RAM;
  • allows for distance education and establishes exemptions for libraries and archives; and
  • protects certain original designs.

Only time will tell how prescient Congress was in formulating the Internet business model that underlies the DMCA. But it is clear that only adequate protection for copyrighted content will fuel the growth of the digital environment.

  • Tweet
Tagged under: Copyright, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, DMCA

What you can read next

Some Free Legal Advice: Why You Should Register Your Copyrights and Trademarks (2011)
Fair Use: Without Harm to the Copyright Owner Can There Really be a Potential Market for a Work? (2010)
Reading the Tea Leaves: ISP Obligations After The Second Circuit’s Viacom v. YouTube Decision (2012)
"Four Decades at the Forefront of Intellectual Property Law."
intellectual-property-lawyer-martindale-hubbell-peer-award-badge-rounded
Elliott C. Alderman
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...
Alderman IP
1455 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20004 USA
Phone: +1-202-596-5682
Email: elliott@thecontentlawyer.com
Alderman IP
1455 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20004 USA
Phone: +1-202-596-5682
Email: elliott@thecontentlawyer.com
© 1993-2023 Alderman IP

Disclaimer
The materials that you obtain through this website are informational only and are not, nor are they intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your specific factual situation. Neither the availability of this website nor the exchange of e-mails through this site, without an executed engagement letter between this firm and a prospective client, creates an attorney/client relationship. The materials on this website are provided “as is,” and are not necessarily accurate, complete or updated. The firm disclaims both express and implied warranties for the information provided, including but not limited to implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

© Elliott Alderman 1993-2023. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution only. All copies must include this copyright statement. The Content Lawyer® is a registered trademark of Elliott Alderman.

TOP